1. Robbing a convenience store and killing a police officer and a store clerk.
2. That he was innocent and falsely accused.
3. October 2005
4. May 2014
5. That he was in his girlfriend's apartment at the time of the crime and that he had made a call from there at around 10:00 am.
6. There was no evidence to support his claim.
7. Phone logs supporting Brown's claim were found in the garage of a homicide investigator.
8. There was also a document found that said that the prosecutors had requested to see the phone records. I think that Lisa Falkenberg is correct in thinking that it was more than just an innocent oversight.
9. The appeals court has yet to okay a new trial.
10. Falkenberg states that Brown is entitled to a fair trial and that unless the judges hurry up, an innocent man could be executed.
11. I think, or at least i hope, that he, by this time, has been released from prison.
12. The piece simultaneously tells a story, states an opinion, and creates an argument. I think this is pretty typical of an op-ed as columns are usually opinionated.
Good answers overall. When I asked No. 12, I mean the writing style of the piece I agree with the threefold purpose, but I also think it is important to note the conversational, informal way she tells the story. Your hope by the way was realized: http://www.chron.com/news/houston-texas/article/DA-6314119.php
ReplyDelete